Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and servers) on. Learn more
111 Highlights 28 Differences 5 Reactions 0 Likes
Anker 312 vs Anker 313: 111 Highlights & 28 Differences — So, Which Charger Actually Works Better
Choose the Anker 312 if you need more wattage, but opt for the Anker 313 for efficient charging and voltage support. What sets Anker 312 apart from Anker 313? This chargers face-off compares specs like usb-c ports, wireless charging power, cable length & interchangeable plugs and beyond.
Plug Insertion Cycles: High Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance. with 1 points higher
Anker 312 vs Anker 313: Compact Chargers with Distinct Strengths
When it comes to portable charging solutions, Anker continues to lead with compact, efficient models designed for everyday use. The Anker 312 and Anker 313 both target beginner users seeking reliable fast charging within a pocket-sized form factor. Both chargers excel at indoor usage, support tablet charging, and offer consistent charging performance with multi-layer safety redundancy for fire and thermal protection. However, they diverge in terms of design technology, power output, and connectivity options. The Anker 312 boasts a higher maximum output power of 67W, targeting power-hungry devices. At the same time, the Anker 313, leveraging GaN technology, focuses on a smaller footprint with a 45W output but includes an additional USB-A port for wider compatibility. Let's dig deeper into what each model offers.
Power and Performance: Anker 312's Robust Charge Capabilities
The Anker 312 shines for those who prioritize raw charging power within a small package. Delivering up to 67 watts, it comfortably supports fast charging for a variety of devices, excluding laptops. Powered by a peak power handling of 20 amps and an output voltage of 5 volts, this charger is optimized for powerful devices requiring consistent energy delivery. The sturdy plastic and polycarbonate housing enhances durability with high scratch resistance and a rated drop resistance level 3. What's more, it maintains excellent heat management efficiency, tolerating a substantial 140°F threshold and operating quietly at just 40 dB, making it suitable for noise-conscious environments. The charger includes a single USB-C port with a fixed power distribution method for simplicity and reliability.
Design and Efficiency: Anker 313's Compact GaN Advantage
In contrast, the Anker 313 impresses with its remarkably small and lightweight design; just 0.21 lbs and standing approximately 1.61 inches tall, thanks to its state-of-the-art GaN (Gallium Nitride) charging technology. This innovation enables it to pack 45 watts of power and a high peak power handling of 45 amps, delivering an output voltage of 20 volts. While it delivers slightly less maximum wattage than the Anker 312, its efficiency is notable, with only about 5% energy loss as heat. The polycarbonate/plastic build provides medium scratch resistance, though no specific drop resistance rating is listed. Its true standout feature lies in the inclusion of both a USB-C and a USB-A port, widening the scope for charging multiple device types simultaneously with consistent performance and high heat management efficacy. The Anker 313 also edges out with more comprehensive customer support channels, offering email, chat, and an online portal.
Quick Take: Key Advantages of Each Charger
The Anker 312 is the better choice for users needing the highest power output combined with robust build quality and quiet operation. In contrast, the Anker 313 excels with its GaN technology boost, lightweight design, and added USB-A port providing versatile charging options all in a more portable package.
Bottom Line: Which Anker Charger Deserves Your Money?
For those seeking maximum wattage for fast, reliable charging at a compelling price, the Anker 312's 67W output and superior durability are hard to beat. However, if you value portability above peak power and want the convenience of additional ports plus cutting-edge GaN tech, the more compact Anker 313 is the smarter pick for your travel or daily carry needs. Both deliver solid safety, efficiency, and support, but your choice boils down to power versus portability and versatility.
Verdict
Winner: Anker 313 - Offers excellent portability with GaN technology, versatile dual ports, and efficient heat management, ideal for on-the-go users.
Runner-up: Anker 312 - Provides superior maximum output power, better scratch and drop resistance, and quiet operation at a budget-friendly price.
Anker 312 was released in the year 2021, while Anker 313 was released in 2023. The newer release date of Anker 313 may reflect more updated features and improvements.
The year the charger model was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 27 score measurement.
Based on community votes for Release Year, Anker 312 ◉ earned 0 votes, less than Anker 313 ◉, which got 1 votes.
The Usage Environment for Anker 312 is Indoor and the same applies for Anker 313. Both are intended for indoor use, which is important for setting expectations about where these chargers perform best.
Specifies the environments where the charger is designed to operate.
In the battle of Usage Environment, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Usage Environment on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Intended Use
What is the intended use of this charger?
74 Anker 312 0Votes Home, Office, Travel
75 Anker 313 0Votes Home, Office, Travel
Anker 312
Intended usage includes home, office, and travel, highlighting its versatility across different environments.
Anker 313
Intended use includes home, office, and travel environments, highlighting versatility for various charging needs.
Describes where and how the charger is primarily intended to be used.
In the battle of Intended Use, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Intended Use on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Technology
What charging technology does it use?
57 Anker 312 0Votes Fast Charging
88 Anker 313 1Votes GaN
vs Charging Technology
Anker 312 uses Fast Charging technology, whereas Anker 313 employs GaN technology. GaN typically offers higher efficiency and smaller size, making Anker 313 potentially more advanced in charging technology.
Indicates the core technology used to deliver power efficiently.
In the battle of Charging Technology, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 31 score measurement.
Based on community votes for Charging Technology, Anker 312 ◉ earned 0 votes, less than Anker 313 ◉, which got 1 votes.
Anker 313 uses GaN tech which feels cooler and more efficient compared to the fast charging tech of Anker 312.
See more
Charger Type
What type of charger is this?
47 Anker 312 0Votes Wall Charger
48 Anker 313 0Votes Wall Charger
Anker 313
This is a wall charger, designed to plug directly into an AC outlet for convenient charging at fixed locations.
Defines the primary charger category based on form and usage.
In the battle of Charger Type, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Charger Type on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Style
What is the mounting style?
57 Anker 312 0Votes Wall-Mounted
58 Anker 313 0Votes Wall-Mounted
Anker 312
The charger is designed to be wall-mounted, saving space and providing a fixed location for charging.
Indicates how the charger is physically positioned during use.
In the battle of Mounting Style, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Mounting Style on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Certifications
What certifications does this charger have?
25 Anker 312 0Votes UL, CE, FCC, RoHS
26 Anker 313 0Votes UL, FCC, CE, RoHS
Anker 312
Certifications include UL, CE, FCC, and RoHS, ensuring compliance with safety and environmental standards globally.
Lists official safety, quality, and compliance certifications held by the charger.
In the battle of Certifications, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Certifications on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Product Name
What is the product name?
62 Anker 312 0Votes Anker 315
68 Anker 313 0Votes Anker 313
vs Product Name
The Product Name for Anker 312 is Anker 315, while for Anker 313 it is Anker 313. The different names indicate these are distinct models, which is crucial for buyers to distinguish their choices.
Official product name used to identify the charger model.
In the battle of Product Name, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Product Name on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Device Compatibility
What devices are compatible with this charger?
54 Anker 312 0Votes Smartphone, Tablet, Accessory
58 Anker 313 0Votes Smartphone, Tablet
Indicates the types of devices the charger can power.
In the battle of Device Compatibility, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Device Compatibility on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility Notes
Are compatibility notes clearly provided?
No 0Votes Anker 312
Yes 0Votes Anker 313
Indicates whether additional compatibility limitations or requirements are clearly disclosed.
In the battle of Compatibility Notes, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Compatibility Notes on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
87 Anker 312 0Votes AC Outlet
88 Anker 313 0Votes AC Outlet
Defines where the charger draws its power from.
In the battle of Power Source, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Source on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Installation Type
How is the charger installed?
47 Anker 312 0Votes Plug-In
48 Anker 313 0Votes Plug-In
Describes how the charger is installed or connected.
In the battle of Installation Type, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Installation Type on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Regulatory Region
Which regulatory regions does it support?
67 Anker 312 0Votes US, EU, UK, Global
58 Anker 313 0Votes US, EU, UK
Indicates the regions where the charger meets regulatory standards.
In the battle of Regulatory Region, Anker 312 ◉ is better than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering higher 9 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Regulatory Region on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Product Form Factor
What is the product form factor?
77 Anker 312 0Votes Ultra-Compact
78 Anker 313 0Votes Ultra-Compact
Describes the overall physical form and size profile of the charger.
In the battle of Product Form Factor, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Product Form Factor on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 312 supports a Maximum Output Power of 67 Watts, whereas Anker 313 supports 45 Watts. Anker 312 offers more power, which may be beneficial for charging higher power devices faster.
The highest total power the charger can deliver to connected devices.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power, Anker 312 ◉ is better than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering higher 22.0 Watt measurement.
Based on community votes for Maximum Output Power, Anker 312 ◉ earned 1 votes, more than Anker 313 ◉, which got 0 votes.
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 313 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs Input Current
Anker 312 has an Input Current of 1.5 Amps, while Anker 313 does not provide Input Current information. Users looking for this specification will find it missing for Anker 313.
The amount of current drawn from the power source during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Input Current on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Peak Power Handling
What peak power can it handle?
20 Watt 0Votes
45 Watt 0Votes
vs Peak Power Handling
The Peak Power Handling of Anker 312 is 20 Watts, but Anker 313 can handle up to 45 Watts. This suggests Anker 313 could sustain higher power peaks better than Anker 312.
The maximum short-term power the charger can safely handle.
In the battle of Peak Power Handling, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 25.0 Watt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Peak Power Handling on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Output Power
What is the minimum output power?
5 Watt 0Votes
5 Watt 0Votes
Anker 312
Minimum output power of 5 Watts supports basic charging needs for lower power devices.
The lowest stable power output supported by the charger.
In the battle of Minimum Output Power, Anker 312 ◉ is same as Anker 313 ◉ , delivering equal 5.00 Watt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Minimum Output Power on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Frequency
What input frequency is supported?
50 Hz 0Votes
50 Hz 0Votes
Anker 312
Designed to operate at an input frequency of 50 Hz, suitable for many global power grids.
The electrical frequency range the charger can accept.
In the battle of Input Frequency, Anker 312 ◉ is same as Anker 313 ◉ , delivering equal 50.00 Hz measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Input Frequency on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Voltage
What is the output voltage?
5 Volt 0Votes
20 Volt 0Votes
vs Output Voltage
Anker 312 has an Output Voltage of 5 Volts, whereas Anker 313 has 20 Volts. The higher voltage in Anker 313 supports faster charging standards and better compatibility with modern devices.
The voltage supplied to connected devices during charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 15.0 Volt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Output Voltage on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current
What is the output current?
3 A 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 313 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Anker 312
Output current is 3 Amperes, suitable for efficient charging of a wide range of devices.
The maximum current delivered to devices for charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Output Current on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Consumption
How much power is used on standby?
0.1 Watt 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 313 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Anker 312
Standby power consumption is 0.1 Watt, indicating minimal power use when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
Power consumed when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Standby Power Consumption on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation
How good is the voltage regulation?
72 Anker 312 0Votes Good
73 Anker 313 0Votes Good
Anker 313
Voltage regulation is good, meaning the charger can maintain stable voltage output within safe limits to avoid device damage.
Indicates how well output voltage remains stable under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Voltage Regulation on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Current Regulation
How good is the current regulation?
72 Anker 312 0Votes Good
73 Anker 313 0Votes Good
Anker 313
Current regulation is rated as good, meaning the charger provides a stable and appropriate current to connected devices, enhancing safety and performance.
Indicates how consistently current is controlled during charging.
In the battle of Current Regulation, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Current Regulation on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage
What input voltage does it support?
240 Volt 0Votes
100 Volt 0Votes
The voltage range required from the power source to operate safely.
In the battle of Input Voltage, Anker 312 ◉ is better than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering higher 140.0 Volt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Input Voltage on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Efficiency
How efficient is the charger?
97 Anker 312 0Votes High
98 Anker 313 0Votes High
Indicates how effectively input power is converted into usable output power.
In the battle of Power Efficiency, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Efficiency on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Factor
What is the power factor?
47 Anker 312 0Votes Medium
48 Anker 313 0Votes Medium
Indicates how efficiently electrical power is drawn from the power source.
In the battle of Power Factor, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Factor on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Load Regulation
How good is the load regulation?
57 Anker 312 0Votes Good
58 Anker 313 0Votes Good
Measures output stability as load increases or decreases.
In the battle of Load Regulation, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Load Regulation on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Ripple & Noise
How much ripple and noise is present?
97 Anker 312 0Votes Low
98 Anker 313 0Votes Low
Indicates the level of electrical noise present in the output.
In the battle of Ripple & Noise, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Ripple & Noise on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Surge Protection Rating
How strong is the surge protection?
87 Anker 312 0Votes Advanced
73 Anker 313 0Votes Enhanced
Indicates the strength of protection against voltage spikes.
In the battle of Surge Protection Rating, Anker 312 ◉ is better than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering higher 14 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Surge Protection Rating on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Short Circuit Protection
Does it have short circuit protection?
Yes 0Votes Anker 312
Yes 0Votes Anker 313
vs Short Circuit Protection
Both Anker 312 and Anker 313 include Short Circuit Protection. This shared feature ensures both products provide basic safety against electrical faults.
Automatically shuts down power if a short circuit is detected.
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Short Circuit Protection on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection included?
Yes 0Votes Anker 312
Yes 0Votes Anker 313
Prevents damage by limiting excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Overcurrent Protection on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it prevent overvoltage?
Yes 0Votes Anker 312
Yes 0Votes Anker 313
Protects devices from excessive voltage output.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Overvoltage Protection on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 313 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs Cable Length
Anker 312 has a Cable Length of 3 feet, but Anker 313 does not provide Cable Length information. This difference impacts users valuing cable length for convenience.
Length of the included charging cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cable Length on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 312 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
1.49 inch 0Votes
vs Width
Anker 312 does not provide Width data, whereas Anker 313 measures 1.49 inches wide. This lacking data for Anker 312 limits comparison of physical dimensions.
The horizontal measurement of the charger body from side to side.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Width on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Material Sustainability Level is Medium for both Anker 312 and Anker 313, indicating a moderate focus on eco-friendly materials in both products.
Use of sustainable or environmentally friendly materials.
In the battle of Material Sustainability Level, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Material Sustainability Level on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Housing Material
What is the housing material?
52 Anker 312 0Votes Plastic, Polycarbonate
53 Anker 313 0Votes Polycarbonate, Plastic
vs Housing Material
Housing Material for Anker 312 is Plastic and Polycarbonate, while for Anker 313 it is Polycarbonate and Plastic. Both use similar durable materials, implying comparable build quality.
Primary material used for the outer charger casing.
In the battle of Housing Material, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Housing Material on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
97 Anker 312 0Votes Reinforced
98 Anker 313 0Votes Reinforced
Anker 313
Port reinforcement ensures the ports are strengthened to avoid damage or loosening from frequent use.
Indicates whether charging ports are reinforced for durability.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Port Reinforcement on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Finish
What is the surface finish?
37 Anker 312 0Votes Matte
38 Anker 313 0Votes Matte
Anker 313
The surface finish is matte, which helps resist fingerprints and offers a subtle, non-glossy appearance.
External surface finish affecting grip and aesthetics.
In the battle of Surface Finish, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Surface Finish on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Build Rigidity
How rigid is the charger build?
87 Anker 312 0Votes Solid
88 Anker 313 0Votes Solid
Anker 313
The build rigidity is solid, contributing to the overall durability and structural integrity of the charger.
Overall structural stiffness of the charger body.
In the battle of Build Rigidity, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Build Rigidity on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Material
What material is the plug made of?
87 Anker 312 0Votes Metal
48 Anker 313 0Votes Metal, Plastic
Material used for the plug prongs and structure.
In the battle of Plug Material, Anker 312 ◉ is better than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering higher 39 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Plug Material on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Fire-Retardant Rating
What is the fire-retardant rating?
97 Anker 312 0Votes V-0
98 Anker 313 0Votes V-0
Fire safety rating of the charger materials.
In the battle of Fire-Retardant Rating, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Fire-Retardant Rating on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Moisture Resistance
Is it resistant to moisture?
97 Anker 312 0Votes Splash-Resistant
0 Anker 313 0Votes None
Ability to withstand moisture exposure.
In the battle of Moisture Resistance, Anker 312 ◉ is better than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering higher 97 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Moisture Resistance on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Throttling Threshold is 140°F for Anker 312 and 104°F for Anker 313. Anker 312 tolerates higher temperatures before throttling, potentially supporting sustained high loads better.
Temperature at which charging power is reduced to prevent overheating.
In the battle of Thermal Throttling Threshold, Anker 312 ◉ is better than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering higher 36.0 °F measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Thermal Throttling Threshold on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Loss as Heat is Low for Anker 312, while Anker 313 has a value of 5 (units unavailable). Anker 312 likely dissipates less energy as heat, improving efficiency.
Percentage of input energy lost as heat during charging.
In the battle of Energy Loss as Heat, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering higher 11 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Energy Loss as Heat on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Sustained Load Temperature Stability is Stable for both Anker 312 and Anker 313, indicating consistent performance under extended use.
Temperature stability during prolonged high-load charging.
In the battle of Sustained Load Temperature Stability, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Sustained Load Temperature Stability on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
72 Anker 312 0Votes -4–140°F
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 313 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Anker 312
Storage temperature range from -4 to 140°F (-20 to 60°C) covers typical conditions for safe transportation and storage.
Temperature range safe for storing the charger when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Storage Temperature Range on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Dissipation Method
How does it dissipate heat?
27 Anker 312 0Votes Passive
28 Anker 313 0Votes Passive
vs Thermal Dissipation Method
Thermal Dissipation Method is Passive for both Anker 312 and Anker 313, implying silent cooling without fans for both models.
Method used to release heat during operation.
In the battle of Thermal Dissipation Method, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Thermal Dissipation Method on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Cooling Design
What internal cooling design is used?
67 Anker 312 0Votes Thermal Pads
78 Anker 313 0Votes Heat Sink
Anker 312
Internal cooling design uses thermal pads to effectively dissipate heat without moving components, enhancing reliability.
Internal structure designed to manage heat.
In the battle of Internal Cooling Design, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 11 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Internal Cooling Design on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Noise Level
How noisy is the charger?
40 dB 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 313 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs Noise Level
Noise Level is specified as 40 dB for Anker 312, but unavailable for Anker 313, so noise performance comparison cannot be made.
Operational noise produced during charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Noise Level on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Altitude Operating Range
What altitude can it operate at?
7 Anker 312 0Votes Sea level–10,000 ft
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 313 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Anker 312
Operating altitude ranges from sea level up to 10,000 feet (3048 meters), allowing reliable use in various geographic elevations.
Maximum altitude at which the charger operates reliably.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Altitude Operating Range on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Range
What is the operating temperature range?
17 Anker 312 0Votes 32–95°F
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 313 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The temperature range within which the charger operates safely.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Operating Temperature Range on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Fanless Design
Is the charger fanless?
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 312 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 313 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates whether cooling is achieved without a fan.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Fanless Design on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Ambient Temperature Tolerance
How tolerant is it to ambient temperatures?
47 Anker 312 0Votes Medium
48 Anker 313 0Votes Medium
Ability to perform in varying ambient temperatures.
In the battle of Ambient Temperature Tolerance, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Ambient Temperature Tolerance on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Support Channels include Email and Online Portal for Anker 312, while Anker 313 adds Chat support as well. Anker 313 thus provides more accessible customer support options.
Ways users can contact customer support.
In the battle of Support Channels, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Support Channels on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Length
How long is the warranty?
45 Anker 312 0Votes 1,5 Years
46 Anker 313 0Votes 1,5 Year
vs Warranty Length
Warranty Length is 1.5 Years for both Anker 312 and Anker 313, offering comparable consumer protection.
Duration of warranty coverage provided with the charger.
In the battle of Warranty Length, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Warranty Length on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Replacement Policy
What is the replacement policy?
57 Anker 312 0Votes Standard Returns
58 Anker 313 0Votes Standard Returns
vs Replacement Policy
Replacement Policy is Standard Returns for both Anker 312 and Anker 313, ensuring similar return procedures.
Defines the terms under which a defective or faulty charger can be replaced.
In the battle of Replacement Policy, Anker 312 ◉ is worse than Anker 313 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Replacement Policy on Anker 312 ◉ vs Anker 313 ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Charging Speed
How satisfied are you with the charging speed of this chargers when powering everyday devices?
Extremely fast charging — Under 1 hour
0Votes
0Votes
Very fast charging — 1 to 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent charging speed — 2 to 4 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Slow charging — 4 to 6 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow charging — Over 6 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Power Output Performance
How well does this chargers provide enough power for phones, tablets, or laptops?
Handles high-demand devices easily — 65 watts or more
0Votes
0Votes
Strong and reliable output — 45 to 64 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Good for most daily devices — 25 to 44 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Limited power capability — 10 to 24 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Very weak power delivery — Under 10 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Durability and Build Quality
How durable does this chargers feel during long-term daily use?
Feels built to last a long time — Over 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very solid and dependable — 3 to 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Decently built for regular use — 2 to 3 years
0Votes
0Votes
Feels somewhat fragile — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Breaks down too quickly — Under 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Portability and Size
How easy is it to carry this chargers for travel or commuting?
Ultra compact and pocketable — Under 3 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Light and travel friendly — 3 to 5 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Moderately easy to carry — 5 to 7 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat bulky — 7 to 10 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy and inconvenient — Over 10 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Heat Management
How well does this chargers control heat during extended charging sessions?
Stays cool even under heavy use — Under 90 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Gets slightly warm — 90 to 100 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Noticeably warm to the touch — 100 to 110 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Runs quite hot — 110 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortably hot — Over 120 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Ease of Use
How easy is it to use this chargers on a daily basis?
Effortless and intuitive — No learning needed
0Votes
0Votes
Very easy to understand — Minimal effort
0Votes
0Votes
Takes a little getting used to — Some adjustment
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly confusing at times — Requires patience
0Votes
0Votes
Frustrating to use — Feels complicated
0Votes
0Votes
Setup Experience
How smooth is the initial setup experience with this chargers?
Instantly ready to use — Plug and charge
0Votes
0Votes
Quick and simple setup — Less than 1 minute
0Votes
0Votes
Setup takes some attention — A few minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Setup feels awkward — Several minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Setup feels annoying — Too many steps
0Votes
0Votes
Design and Visual Appeal
How attractive does the design of this chargers look in everyday environments?
Sleek and modern look — Feels premium
0Votes
0Votes
Clean and stylish design — Looks nice
0Votes
0Votes
Simple and acceptable — Nothing special
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat unattractive — Feels dated
0Votes
0Votes
Cheap-looking design — Not appealing
0Votes
0Votes
Noise and Comfort
How comfortable is this chargers to use in quiet environments?
Completely silent operation — No noise at all
0Votes
0Votes
Almost silent — Barely noticeable
0Votes
0Votes
Occasionally noticeable — Slight sound
0Votes
0Votes
Clearly noticeable noise — Can be distracting
0Votes
0Votes
Annoyingly loud — Very disruptive
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing and Value
How do you feel about the price of this chargers compared to what it offers?
Supermod 
Moderator 
Recaptor 
0 Cartling 
